2025

Vol.32 No.3

Editorial Office

Review

  • Journal of the Microelectronics and Packaging Society
  • Volume 32(2); 2025
  • Article

Review

Journal of the Microelectronics and Packaging Society 2025;32(2):39-46. Published online: Jul, 30, 2025

Effects of Diffusion Barrier Materials on the Interfacial Adhesion Energy of Ru/SiO2 for Advanced Ru interconnect

  • Woobin Kwon1 , Minjin Kim1 , Gahui Kim1 , Daeyoon Jeong2 , Youn-Hye Kim3 , Yohei Kotsugi4 , Soo-Hyun Kim5,6, and Young-Bae Park2,†
    1 R&D, Amkor Technology Korea Inc., 150, Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon 21991, Republic of Korea 2 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Gyeongkuk National University, 1375, Gyeongdong-ro, Andong-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 36729, Republic of Korea 3 School of Materials Science and Engineering, Yeungnam University, 292, Daehak-ro, Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do 38541, Republic of Korea 4 Chemical Materials Development Department, TANAKA Precious Metals, 22, Wadai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 300-4247, Japan 5 Graduate School of Semiconductor Materials and Devices Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, 50, UNIST-gil, Eonyang-eup, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea 6 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, 50, UNIST-gil, Eonyang-eup, Ulju-gun, Ulsan 44919, Republic of Korea
Corresponding author E-mail: ybpark@anu.ac.kr
Abstract

The quantitative interfacial adhesion energies of transition metal nitride materials were evaluated using the double cantilever beam method for advanced Ru interconnect applications, and the delaminated surfaces were analyzed to identify the failure locus. When TiN and MoN were applied as diffusion barrier layers, the interfacial adhesion energy was 1.42 ± 0.27 and 3.53 ± 0.61 J/m2 , respectively. This indicates that the MoN exhibited approximately 1.5 times higher adhesion than TiN. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results confirmed that both samples exhibited delamination between the diffusion barrier and the SiO2 interface. This suggests that the higher interfacial adhesion energy observed in the MoN sample is attributed to the lower mismatch in coefficient of thermal expansion with SiO2, resulting in reduced residual stress during film deposition and thermal processing. In addition, the higher oxidation activation energy of MoN compared to TiN leads to the formation of a more stable oxide, thereby contributing to its higher interfacial adhesion energy.

Keywords Ru interconnect, Transition metal nitride, Diffusion barrier, Atomic layer deposition, Interfacial adhesion energy, Double cantilever beam